<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article: The Future of Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/article-the-future-of-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/article-the-future-of-technology/</link>
	<description>Tyler Kearn&#039;s Take on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:37:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/article-the-future-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=507#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. What you say is true. Traditional publishers definitely don&#039;t want to be cut out of the transaction entirely, which is what can happen if an author publishes directly to ebook stores. However, this is good for authors -- it gives them more opportunity to get their writing in front of people and they get to keep more of the revenues from what they write. This will give ebook stores a greater content library than their physical counterparts (since ebook stores will also include the content from the &quot;traditional&quot; publishers), which should only further increase the adoption of ebooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. What you say is true. Traditional publishers definitely don&#8217;t want to be cut out of the transaction entirely, which is what can happen if an author publishes directly to ebook stores. However, this is good for authors &#8212; it gives them more opportunity to get their writing in front of people and they get to keep more of the revenues from what they write. This will give ebook stores a greater content library than their physical counterparts (since ebook stores will also include the content from the &#8220;traditional&#8221; publishers), which should only further increase the adoption of ebooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel P. T. McWithers</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/article-the-future-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel P. T. McWithers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=507#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Another reason for the rise of ebooks - perhaps the single-biggest - is authors.  They make an average of 15% commission on hardcover book sales, while may e-book carriers are negotiating rates in excess of 50% (which is often enough to dwarf their revenue per book even with the lower ebook prices).  For many authors, especially budding ones, going digital rather than paper is a way to &quot;cut out the middleman&quot;.  Not to mention the fact that content standards are usually less rigorous for e-publishing than regular publishing.  This raises a point in and of itself: whether e-book vs. paper book, at least on the new release front, becomes pop-author vs. high-brow author.  I&#039;m not sure this is a trend traditional publishers would be happy with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason for the rise of ebooks &#8211; perhaps the single-biggest &#8211; is authors.  They make an average of 15% commission on hardcover book sales, while may e-book carriers are negotiating rates in excess of 50% (which is often enough to dwarf their revenue per book even with the lower ebook prices).  For many authors, especially budding ones, going digital rather than paper is a way to &#8220;cut out the middleman&#8221;.  Not to mention the fact that content standards are usually less rigorous for e-publishing than regular publishing.  This raises a point in and of itself: whether e-book vs. paper book, at least on the new release front, becomes pop-author vs. high-brow author.  I&#8217;m not sure this is a trend traditional publishers would be happy with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

