<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tyler the Tech Guy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com</link>
	<description>Tyler Kearn&#039;s Take on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:37:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Around Attachment Size Limits &#8212; Update and Expansion by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/get-around-attachment-size-limits-update-and-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-4147</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=554#comment-4147</guid>
		<description>Glad I could help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I could help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Around Attachment Size Limits &#8212; Update and Expansion by paco</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/get-around-attachment-size-limits-update-and-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-4132</link>
		<dc:creator>paco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=554#comment-4132</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU - Finally the info I was looking for.  I spent 5 hours trying to send 12 pictures through my G-mail account. Would have been almost quicker to POST them - OMG!!!!

I cant understand why Microsoft does&#039;nt exploit this in their marketing - anyway Im boycoting G-mail from now and signing up with the old enemy. Shame on you GOOGLE for being so behind - thnx again for the info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU &#8211; Finally the info I was looking for.  I spent 5 hours trying to send 12 pictures through my G-mail account. Would have been almost quicker to POST them &#8211; OMG!!!!</p>
<p>I cant understand why Microsoft does&#8217;nt exploit this in their marketing &#8211; anyway Im boycoting G-mail from now and signing up with the old enemy. Shame on you GOOGLE for being so behind &#8211; thnx again for the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Opt Out of Advertisers Tracking You by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/how-to-opt-out-of-advertisers-tracking-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=788#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard of this site before, and it&#039;s hard for me to tell from a quick browse how legitimate the site is. The Web of Trust extension seems to think that the site is trustworthy. The opt-out feature didn&#039;t work for me in Chrome (it got hung up on the &quot;checking status&quot; screen), but in Internet Explorer it is giving me the option to opt out of several personalized ad companies&#039; tracking.

I won&#039;t know whether it works until I try it and get a sense of the ads being served to me, but if it does work this seems pretty great.

I do have a question though of whether this opt out is permanent or whether it is something that you will have to redo every time you clear your cookies or restart your browser, since permanency is the justification for making opt-out a browser extension or a built-in browser feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of this site before, and it&#8217;s hard for me to tell from a quick browse how legitimate the site is. The Web of Trust extension seems to think that the site is trustworthy. The opt-out feature didn&#8217;t work for me in Chrome (it got hung up on the &#8220;checking status&#8221; screen), but in Internet Explorer it is giving me the option to opt out of several personalized ad companies&#8217; tracking.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t know whether it works until I try it and get a sense of the ads being served to me, but if it does work this seems pretty great.</p>
<p>I do have a question though of whether this opt out is permanent or whether it is something that you will have to redo every time you clear your cookies or restart your browser, since permanency is the justification for making opt-out a browser extension or a built-in browser feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Opt Out of Advertisers Tracking You by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/how-to-opt-out-of-advertisers-tracking-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=788#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>The site http://www.aboutads.info/choices/ claims to let you  opt-out from personalized ads by 59 currently participating firms.  It lists those which already have cookie-marked your browser.  Is it for real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site <a href="http://www.aboutads.info/choices/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aboutads.info/choices/</a> claims to let you  opt-out from personalized ads by 59 currently participating firms.  It lists those which already have cookie-marked your browser.  Is it for real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon finally has the iPhone. . . but should you get one? by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/verizon-finally-has-the-iphone-but-should-you-get-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=768#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Hey Zak,

Tethering is possible on AT&amp;T, but it uses Bluetooth to connect the phone to a laptop. The difference with Verizon&#039;s mobile hotspot technology (which I do think will eventually be available on the AT&amp;T phone), is that it connects to a laptop or other device using Wifi. Rather than having to pair a device to your phone over Bluetooth, the Verizon iPhone will show up under the available wifi networks. There are two advantages to this over the Bluetooth tethering. 1) It allows you to access the internet on more than one device at a time, since up to 5 can connect simultaneously. 2) You can connect to the web on devices that don&#039;t have bluetooth (many laptops don&#039;t) and on non-laptop devices which support wifi (such as the iPad).

Thanks for the comment. Hope this info is helpful!

Tyler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Zak,</p>
<p>Tethering is possible on AT&#038;T, but it uses Bluetooth to connect the phone to a laptop. The difference with Verizon&#8217;s mobile hotspot technology (which I do think will eventually be available on the AT&#038;T phone), is that it connects to a laptop or other device using Wifi. Rather than having to pair a device to your phone over Bluetooth, the Verizon iPhone will show up under the available wifi networks. There are two advantages to this over the Bluetooth tethering. 1) It allows you to access the internet on more than one device at a time, since up to 5 can connect simultaneously. 2) You can connect to the web on devices that don&#8217;t have bluetooth (many laptops don&#8217;t) and on non-laptop devices which support wifi (such as the iPad).</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. Hope this info is helpful!</p>
<p>Tyler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon finally has the iPhone. . . but should you get one? by Zak Stoltz</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/verizon-finally-has-the-iphone-but-should-you-get-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak Stoltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=768#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>Actually, it looks like tethering is possible on AT&amp;T:
http://gizmodo.com/5553135/att-iphone-tethering-an-extra-20month</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it looks like tethering is possible on AT&amp;T:<br />
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5553135/att-iphone-tethering-an-extra-20month" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5553135/att-iphone-tethering-an-extra-20month</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is There a Reason To Hang On To Your Landline? by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/is-there-a-reason-to-hang-on-to-your-landline/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=613#comment-757</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to argue with that. Unfortunately, it seems like the cell phone infrastructure improvements can barely keep up with regular use, let alone handle any kind of exceptional situation. I was at the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear in DC over the weekend, and with 200,000+ people in the National Mall the networks were so overloaded that no one could make a call or even send a text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to argue with that. Unfortunately, it seems like the cell phone infrastructure improvements can barely keep up with regular use, let alone handle any kind of exceptional situation. I was at the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear in DC over the weekend, and with 200,000+ people in the National Mall the networks were so overloaded that no one could make a call or even send a text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is There a Reason To Hang On To Your Landline? by Amazing Iceman</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/is-there-a-reason-to-hang-on-to-your-landline/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazing Iceman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=613#comment-755</guid>
		<description>The problem arises when the people you need to reach during an emergency only have cell phones or are not home to answer their landline.

So, if you think about it, the real solution is for mobile carriers to improve their capacity and service availability to be prepared to get flooded with calls after a disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem arises when the people you need to reach during an emergency only have cell phones or are not home to answer their landline.</p>
<p>So, if you think about it, the real solution is for mobile carriers to improve their capacity and service availability to be prepared to get flooded with calls after a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Influential Gadgets. . . For Me by The Most Influential Gadgets. . . For Me &#124; Tyler the Tech Guy &#124; Adult Society</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/the-most-influential-gadgets-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>The Most Influential Gadgets. . . For Me &#124; Tyler the Tech Guy &#124; Adult Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=720#comment-674</guid>
		<description>[...] See the article here: The Most Influential Gadgets. . . For Me &#124; Tyler the Tech Guy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the article here: The Most Influential Gadgets. . . For Me | Tyler the Tech Guy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Influential Gadgets. . . For Me by Paul S. Chun</title>
		<link>http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/the-most-influential-gadgets-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S. Chun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tylerthetechguy.com/?p=720#comment-660</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with the usefulness in netbooks.

I have been using an Asus UL30A-X5 as my laptop (and until recently, my main computer) and it&#039;s been awesome. It&#039;s not a netbook, but it&#039;s about as close as a laptop can get. Light as hell, and drivers are available in almost all major distributions of Linux. I love bringing it to meetups or even on the muni and hacking away. Power + Portability = Win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the usefulness in netbooks.</p>
<p>I have been using an Asus UL30A-X5 as my laptop (and until recently, my main computer) and it&#8217;s been awesome. It&#8217;s not a netbook, but it&#8217;s about as close as a laptop can get. Light as hell, and drivers are available in almost all major distributions of Linux. I love bringing it to meetups or even on the muni and hacking away. Power + Portability = Win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

